From The Sunday
Times, U.K.
August 18, 2002
Daniel Pearl: A Banner of Hope
(Published under a different title)
By Judea Pearl
Daniel Pearl, the Wall Street Journal reporter who
was kidnapped and murdered in Pakistan more than six
months ago, was laid to rest last Sunday in Los Angeles,
California. Danny was my son.
I last spoke to him on January 21, two days before
his abduction, when he called to tell us the great news:
he and Mariane had discovered their child would be a
boy.
Danny's remains were flown back from Karachi after
months of searching for the body and procedural delays.
The funeral ceremony was private and simple: family
and close friends gathered to pay last respects to their
beloved Danny; a violinist friend played selections
from Bach; the rabbi reflected on the significance of
Danny's life and work; I said the Kaddish (the Jewish
prayer of mourning) and Danny's body was finally laid
to rest in his home town, overlooking the concert hall
where he loved to perform with his youth orchestra.
But who was this young man whose life and writings
caught world attention? Why has the world been shocked
by his death? Why has he become a symbol? And what is
he a symbol of? After all, Danny was not a political
leader, military hero or famous celebrity, yet millions
of people worldwide identify with his life, tragedy,
mission and legacy.
For his family and friends, Danny was "a walking
sunshine of truth, humour, friendship and compassion"
with "not one shred of malice in his bones"
(the description comes from "At Home in the World,"
a recently published anthology of Danny's articles for
The Wall Street Journal). Among his colleagues, Danny
was known as a fiddler, storyteller and a bridge-builder
who formed connections wherever he went. To his readers
he was an unbiased truth seeker who made the world seem
friendlier.
The shocking aspects of Danny's death exceed any imaginable
account. A cold-blood killing of a reporter is in itself
a barbaric act of unprecedented character. Coupled with
the fact that this reporter was a gentle soul, with
a pregnant wife who appealed for his release, and that
the brutal murder was enacted in front of a camera,
the killing of Danny marks a new dimension of savagery.
The irony of this tragedy is that Danny was the antithesis
of the "ugly American" that the terrorists
were hoping to capture and destroy. Wherever he went,
Danny radiated friendship and genuine respect for people
of all backgrounds. For millions, then, he came to personify
tolerance, humanity and dialogue, and his death turned
him into a symbol for these values.
Furthermore, his lively prose, honesty and sensitivity
to other cultures made him a perfect emissary for the
West and the Muslim worlds to understand each other
better. Therefore, Danny's murder represents a betrayal
of humanity, and it tests the very survival of civilised
society as we know it.
Another shocking element of this tragedy is the role
played by Danny's Jewish background in the planning
and execution of the murder. Danny's captors did not
hide their underlying motives. Whereas their early communications
expressed anti-American and anti-journalism passions,
the videotape depicting Danny's murder exposes raw anti-Jewish
hatred. Danny's captors showed no interest whatsoever
in his background or work except his "crimes"
- Danny's Jewish and Israeli heritage. Clearly, knowing
the mentality of their prospective audience, the murderers
were confident that Danny's Jewish connections were
sufficient to licence the gruesome actions they planned.
Such a brazen call to licence the killing of human
beings by virtue of their religion or heritage has not
resonated on this planet since the second world war.
It is natural to ask how we, his family and friends,
are coping with this tragedy. The answer is not easy.
In addition to our personal loss, the tragedy is amplified
by the fact that Danny's killers seem to have achieved
their objectives.
They embarrassed Pakistan's President Pervez Musharraf,
gained publicity, recruited more terrorists, inflicted
pain and humiliation on the West and scared foreign
journalists. They even managed to find publicity-seeking
publishers to help disseminate their gruesome propaganda
tapes.
On the surface, then, they seemed to have won on all
fronts - a thought that initially caused us great pain.
Fortunately, we became aware of positive developments
beneath the surface that have given us the strength
to endure the tragedy and to turn it into a source of
hope and strength.
Danny's death has generated an enormous awakening of
goodwill worldwide, as witnessed by thousands of letters,
e-mails, donations and ideas on how to prevent such
tragedies in the future and make the world a better
place. This awakening has called our attention to the
good things that can come out of our tragedy, and has
prompted Daniel's family, friends and colleagues to
establish the Daniel Pearl Foundation in his honour
(www.danielpearl.org).
The foundation aims to continue Danny's mission; to
create positive connections among people of different
cultures, to reduce cultural and religious hatred, to
encourage responsible and creative journalism and to
enrich people's lives through music.
This mission may sound ambitious - some might even
consider it unrealistic - but the opportunities presented
are unique and real, and cannot therefore be overlooked.
The trust and respect that Danny earned, especially
in the Middle East and south Asia, allow us to embrace
and mobilise new communities to work towards bridging
the East-West divides.
We have been fortunate indeed to enlist prominent public
figures and activists as advisers, board members and
volunteers, with representatives from all parts of the
political spectrum. In particular, we were gratified
to receive tremendous encouragement from Pakistanis.
While only time will tell how successful our efforts
will be in penetrating major pockets of closed-mindedness,
the prospect of saving some communities from the deadly
claws of hatred fills our lives with hope that some
good may come after all from Danny's tragedy.
The anti-semitic component of Danny's murder has also
generated a counter-offensive. In his April 30 speech
President George W Bush said: "We reject the ancient
evil of anti-semitism whether it is practised by the
killers of Daniel Pearl or by those who burn synagogues
in France." Such statements made us realise that
if Danny's death can raise people's awareness of the
various manifestations of intolerance and inspire them
to speak against them, each and all, a giant step would
then be made towards a peaceful, hate-free world.
But the greatest uplifting to me and my family came
in realising how Danny's legacy becomes a "banner"
and a source of strength and inspiration to various
peace-loving communities in the West. By killing Danny,
the terrorists have in effect destroyed the "ugly
West" image that they and their ideological supporters
have laboured to erect in the past few decades, be it
explicitly or implicitly.
Instead, what emerged from this killing was an image
of westerners (including Americans, and Jews and Israelis)
as exporters of values. It has reminded many that in
addition to colonialism, materialism, arrogance, selfishness
and other ills and maladies that we are constantly being
accused of inventing or practising, the West is also
the world's largest exporter of pluralism, tolerance,
dialogue and basic freedoms and values, which Danny
personified in his life and which were violated by his
murderers. I became aware of this aspect of Danny's
legacy when letters started to arrive suggesting monuments,
memorials and awards in Danny's honour.
I came to realise then that many goodwill organisations,
fighting for noble causes in the service of humanity,
have difficulty finding a symbol that would give the
spirit of humanity a face and a body and a smile.
And I understood then that if Danny's death can give
humanity, or whatever is left of her, the banner that
she needs to defend herself, something good may come
out of it. Thus, if my grandson Adam asks me 10 years
from now: "What good came out of it?", my
answer will be: "Your father gave humanity a banner
with which to fight hatred and fanaticism and intolerance."
"And a banner is a very powerful weapon! It makes
each soldier feel an inch taller, it calls for duty
new recruits and it makes armies march in unison."
My hopes are that I will be able to add: "You
see? Your father's banner helped us win that battle."
Judea Pearl is professor of computer science at
the University of California, Los Angeles, and president
of the Daniel Pearl Foundation. |